Nanotehnologii sunt pași mici spre fabricarea atomică la scară 3D

se va deschide porțile pentru tehnologiile emergente în calcul, energie, cataliza, și o serie de alt articol de revizuire recente fields.A (în ACS Nano „Directing Materia: Spre Nanofabrication Atomic-Scale 3D „) Ilustrează utilizarea fascicule de electroni și ioni concentrat (e-grinzi și traverse) pentru a induce reacții chimice foarte localizate la interfețe solide la vapori și solid-lichid, amorfe transformări de fază cristaline cu precizie strat atomic, iar mișcarea atom specific dopant unic, în barilor de cristal, punând astfel bazele pentru asamblarea atomically precis direcționată a materialelor și a creșterii devices.

Nanotechnology’s tiny steps toward atomic-scale 3D fabrication

(Nanowerk Spotlight) Over the past few decades, the development of electron microscopy has gone hand in hand with techniques for atomically precise fabrication of 3D structures based on electron and ion beams.All material functionality is governed by the type, arrangement, and bonding of atoms. Enabling the capacity to perform atomically precise directed assembly of matter will open the doors to emerging technologies in computing, energy, catalysis, and a plethora of other fields.A recent review article in ACS Nano („Directing Matter: Toward Atomic-Scale 3D Nanofabrication”) illustrates the use of focused electron and ion beams (e-beams and i-beams) to induce highly localized chemical reactions at solid-vapor and solid-liquid interfaces, amorphous to crystalline phase transformations with atomic layer precision, and the motion of specific single dopant atoms within crystal lattices, thus laying the foundation for atomically precise directed assembly of materials and devices.The growth of plasmonic gold nanostructures by electron beam induced deposition (EBID) has been demonstrated already 10 years ago and the physics behind this nanofabrication technique has been explored (see for instance: „Scientists unveil new physics behind the nanofabrication technique of electron beam induced deposition„). The process has been improved over the years and researchers are now able to grow structures much faster with a broad range of precursors (see: „A new process for rapidly fabricating complex 3D nanostructures„).In their review, the authors emphasize the synergy between imaging, nanofabrication, and modeling in order to reveal the fundamental mechanisms of charged particle-surface interaction.They present several recent examples that suggest the feasibility of atomically precise fabrication in the bulk, including creating specific dopant configurations, ordered vacancy planes, and other structures.The article covers EBID/IBID from gas or liquid precursors, e-beam-induced crystallization in the bulk, and the ability to image and to analyze single atoms and defects in 2D structures.Patterning of a MoSe nanowire network(a) Patterning of a MoSe nanowire network, where each nanowire is sculpted individually. (b) Ramified Y junction made of three MoSe nanowires. (c-l) Serial snapshots of the sculpting process of individual MoSe (c-g) and MoS (h-l) nanowires. All images are STEM Z-contrast images, false-colored for better visibility. Scale bars, 2 nm (a), 0.5 nm (b-l). (© Nature Publishing Group) (click on image to enlarge)Electron-beam/ion-beam-induced deposition from gas precursorsDiscussing Focused Electron-Beam-Induced Processing – a nanoscale direct-write synthesis technique where an electron beam directs assembly of a surface-adsorbed precursor via an electron-stimulated chemical reaction – and Focused Ion-Beam-Induced Processing – where the deposition and etching of nanoscale materials is induced by a focused ion beam – the authors show how these techniques were developed; they discuss their benefits but also obstacles to large-scale implementation.Eelectron-beam/ion-beam-induced deposition from liquid precursorsAn alternative pathway to using gas precursors for direct nanofabrication is direct-write with electron and/or ion beams with a liquid precursor. This method utilizes the e-beam or i-beam as an ionizing source that decomposes solvent molecules to generate solvated electrons and other radicals in a complex cascade of reaction pathways.When using electrons to direct-write in solution, the minimal size of the created structures is limited to the nanometer scale due to the fundamental physics of the interactions between the electron beam and the liquid, including the lateral transport of solvated electrons and ionic species. The helium ion beam, on the other hand, might offer the potential for improved resolution.Atomically precise e-beam-induced crystallization in the bulkE-beam and i-beam patterning are popular and versatile approaches for creating structures on ∼10-100 nm scales, typically in SEM-like geometry. However, in the field of imaging, high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) has long been a tool of choice because it allows for atomic-scale studies of crystals and nanoparticles.As the authors note, over the last 15 years, aberration correction has pushed the achievable resolution into the sub-angstrom range and allowed for much greater localization of the probe in STEM geometry, suggesting that higher precision patterning should be achievable using these improved electron probes.Provided that the electron beam path can be programmed, localization of features in the areas illuminated by the beam and the ability to control their growth allows for more complex patterning.The team writes that the manufacturing of epitaxial crystalline nanostructures with predefined shapes is particularly interesting, as adjustable strain states could yield ways to control properties, and the ordered final structures can be more easily modeled than amorphous structures.Si6 cluster configurations embedded in a graphene pore(a,d) ADF Z-contrast images of two representative stable Si6 cluster configurations embedded in a graphene pore. (b,e) Two- and (c,f) three-dimensional structures obtained from first-principles calculations. Si and C atoms below the graphene plane are shaded. L or R labels are used to highlight when the oscillating Si atom is either at the left or right sites. Scale bar, 0.2 nm. (© Nature Publishing Group) (click on image to enlarge)Single-atom dynamics and beyondThe difficulties in manipulating single atoms for nanoscale engineering were famously highlighted by Stemmer („Three-dimensional imaging of individual dopant atoms in SrTiO3„).The use of an electron beam might provide an answer to this dilemma by allowing the direct addressing of single atoms in bulk 3D materials.The review highlights results („Direct Observation of Dopant Atom Diffusion in a Bulk Semiconductor Crystal Enhanced by a Large Size Mismatch”) that show the interplay between the materials science aspect of calculated diffusion barriers and the energy supplied to the sample by the electron beam.As the authors point out: „This relation is important because it is possible to directly control the accelerating voltage in a (S)TEM, thereby altering the energy transferred to the material. This concept raises several tantalizing prospects for the future as to what extent the final position of the dopant can be controlled. If single dopants could be directly manipulated, an obvious application would be toward quantum computing.”Link theory and dataIncreasing computer power and more sophisticated analytical software allows analyzing experimental data in near real-time. This provides the ability to have rapid feedback to and from models and simulations that both inform and validate the simulations/model, which may ultimately provide predictive capabilities to guide experiments.Until recently, advances in microscopy relied on improvements in the instrumentation platforms, focused probes, lenses, detectors, measurement modalities, and mathematical tools for extraction of materials-specific parameters from imaging data. However, in almost all cases, due to the complexity and size of the available signals, only a small, manually selected subset of the fully generated information volume is recorded and an even smaller subset of this is processed.In the future, new tools will allow the (real-time) monitoring and analysis of the full data stream from the microscope. This would also allow researchers to take full advantage of all of the information contained in experimental data to provide input into computational methods to predict and understand materials.The authors conclude that „in order to see what is happening as it is happening, a significant emphasis must be placed on forming a tight loop between expansive dynamic streaming EELS (electron energy loss spectroscopy), tomographic, and ptychographic data sets provided by experimental platforms and the model-driven interpretation of the data. As the techniques mature, these theory-in-the-loop approaches will also significantly expedite the quality control process, an important facet in transitioning from scientific test-beds to high-volume manufacturing.”By Michael is author of two books by the Royal Society of Chemistry: Nano-Society: Pushing the Boundaries of Technology and Nanotechnology: The Future is Tiny.

Read more: Nanotechnology’s tiny steps toward atomic-scale 3D fabrication

Sprijinirea dezvoltării responsabile a nanotehnologiei

Se pot detecta acum nanoparticule cu mult sub nivelurile de toxicitate cunoscute și sub pragul acțiunilor de reglementare economice și rezonabile Înlătură probleme complexe de determinare a biomarkerilor expunerii legate de boală problemei complexe de determinare a biomarkerilor expunerii legate de boală.

Posted: May 31, 2016

Supporting responsible development of nanotechnology

(Nanowerk News) Nanotechnology environmental, health, and safety (nanoEHS) activities have become a hallmark of the National Nanotechnology Initiative (NNI). Well-coordinated nanoEHS research and development (R&D) is essential to ensuring a future in which responsible development of nanotechnology provides maximum benefit to society and the environment. These efforts are pivotal in contributing to American innovation and to advancing manufacturing and economic competitiveness.

Progress in nanoEHS research is vital to establishing the regulatory certainty and public confidence needed for companies to bring their nanotechnology products to market and to ensuring that these products are safe and sustainable throughout their life cycles.
Three reports recently released highlight Federal investments and activities in this area, progress and needs in understanding exposure from consumer products, and how businesses can protect their nanotechnology workforce. In addition, an upcoming workshop will explore the work of joint U.S.–European Union nanoEHS communities of research in developing a shared repertoire of protocols and methods.
The recently released NNI Supplement to the President’s Budget for Fiscal Year 2017, which serves as the annual report for the NNI, highlights the programs and coordinated activities taking place across the many departments, independent agencies, and commissions participating today in the NNI—an initiative that continues to serve as a model for effective coordination of Federal science and technology R&D.
As detailed in this report, nanoEHS activities continue to account for about 10 percent of the annual NNI budget, with cumulative Federal R&D investments in this area exceeding $1 billion over the past decade. This report includes descriptions of a wide variety of individual agency and coordinated activities supporting the responsible development of nanotechnology.
To understand and control the risks of using any new materials in consumer products, it is important to understand the potential for exposure and any associated hazards across product life cycles. Last month, the NNI released a report, Quantifying Exposure to Engineered Nanomaterials (QEEN) from Manufactured Products: Addressing Environmental, Health, and Safety Implications, summarizing a workshop on this topic sponsored by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC).
The main goals of the workshop were to assess progress in developing tools and methods for quantifying exposure to engineered nanomaterials across the product life cycle, and to identify new research needed to advance exposure assessment for nanotechnology-enabled products. As noted in the report, significant progress has been made in the ability to quantify nanomaterial exposures, such that available methods can now detect nanoparticles well below known toxicity levels and beneath the threshold of economical and reasonable regulatory action. However, greater understanding of exposure risks in “real-world” scenarios is needed, along with techniques, based on alternative testing models and high-throughput methods for rapidly estimating exposures.
The technical experts who participated in CPSC’s workshop recommended that future work focus on the complex issue of determining biomarkers of exposure linked to disease, which will require substantive public–private collaboration, partnership, and knowledge sharing. Recognizing these needs, the President’s 2017 Budget request for CPSC (pdf) includes funds for a new nanotechnology center led by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) to develop test methods and to quantify and characterize the presence, release, and mechanisms of consumer exposure to nanomaterials in consumer products. This cost-effective, interagency collaboration will enable CPSC—through NIEHS—to collect the needed data to inform the safety of nanotechnology in consumer products and allow CPSC to benefit from NIEHS’s scientific network and experience.
Managing EHS risks across a product’s lifecycle includes protecting the workers who manufacture those products. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health has issued a series of documents providing guidance to this emerging industry, including the recently released publication Building a Safety Program to Protect the Nanotechnology Workforce: A Guide for Small to Medium-Sized Enterprises. This guide provides business owners with the tools necessary to develop and implement a written health and safety program to protect their employees.
The responsible development of nanotechnology is a goal that the United States shares with many countries. The United States and the European Union are engaged in notable cooperation on this front. European and American scientists engaged in nanoEHS research convene annually for a joint workshop to identify areas of shared interest and mechanisms for collaboration to advance nanoEHS science. The 2016 joint workshop will be held on June 6–7, 2016 in Arlington, VA, and is free and open to the public. Registration opened on April 6, 2016, on a first-come, first-served basis.
Source: By Lloyd Whitman, Assistant Director for Nanotechnology and Advanced Materials at the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy

Read more: Supporting responsible development of nanotechnology